Evidence preparation for regulated or review-heavy work.
claim mapping
Break documents into assertions and map each to support, missing evidence, or gaps.
standards alignment
Structure material against the target framework so evidence matches reviewer expectations.
adversarial pressure
Challenge packages with critique passes surfacing unsupported extrapolation, contradictions, and assumptions.
Typical compliance-facing deliverables.
evidence pack
review memo
Representative gate logic, redacted but real enough to inspect.
gate_03: semantic_drift
threshold: > 0.01
result: FAILED
// review note
claim language exceeds source support
remove extrapolation before signoff gate_05: citation_traceability
references_checked: 42
verified: 39
result: FAILED
// review note
3 references unresolved
delivery blocked until support is restored The output is allowed to stop. That is the point. Axion is useful when hidden failure is more expensive than visible friction.
This is not a philosophy layer pasted over generic drafting. Claims, drift, and traceability have failure conditions that block delivery.
Where this is useful.
A traceable review package that shows support, gaps, and revision priorities explicitly.
This slows down first-pass writing because weak claims are stopped instead of being smoothed over.
Bring the document that needs to survive review.
We scope the standard, pressure-test the claims, and return a package your responsible reviewer can inspect without guessing what is solid and what is not.
[ audit ]