A review you can act on before you submit.
citation report
Every citation is checked against live reference systems. Unsupported or mismatched references are flagged before submission pressure increases.
reviewer-style objection memo
The weaknesses a study section is likely to raise on your draft, ranked by risk, so you can repair them while there is still time.
policy flags
Places where the draft conflicts with current NIH policy or reporting requirements.
revision checklist
A short list of what to repair before submission. Axion reviews your proposal; it does not write it.
Three steps.
you send
Your draft, Specific Aims, or the section under pressure, plus the reference list. Prior reviewer comments add context if this is a resubmission.
we review
Citations are verified, the draft is read for policy conflicts, and reviewer-style objections are mapped against your claims.
you decide
You receive the citation report, objection memo, and revision checklist, with a recommended next step: query if the question is narrow, assessment if the deliverable is bounded, quoted scope if the proposal needs deeper work.
Request grants intake review
send the proposal pressure point. we review the material, define the output, and confirm whether this should begin as a query, assessment, or quoted scope.