01 // the challenge

AD research faces brutal validation standards. For good reason.

Biomarker validation pressure

Amyloid, tau, neurofilament light — which biomarker claims replicate across cohorts? Which are overfitted to specific populations?

Trial failure rates are brutal

AD trials fail at 99%+ rates. Evidence synthesis before Phase 2 commitment catches weak hypotheses early.

Mechanism claims need scrutiny

Neuroinflammation, synaptic dysfunction, protein aggregation — mechanism claims need verified evidence, not optimistic extrapolation.

02 // the axion approach

Adversarial review before publication or trial commitment.

2+ independent model families

Multi-model adversarial review

Independent model families attack your claims from different architectural perspectives, producing a claim-support audit and independent contradiction memo. No single model's blind spots.

3 independent review passes

Adversarial claim testing

Claims that survive multi-model adversarial attack are stronger submissions. Claims that don't survive save you a trial cycle.

every doi checked

Citation verification

Every DOI is checked against live databases before delivery. Fabricated or mismatched references are flagged.

03 // results

What the pipeline produces.

2+ independent model families
3 independent review passes
the value

Pre-trial adversarial review: With 99%+ AD trial failure rates, the cost of a weak hypothesis is measured in years and millions. Multi-model adversarial attack surfaces weaknesses before you commit resources.

04 // start

Research audit for Alzheimer's work.

Send one hypothesis, biomarker claim, or mechanism assertion. We run it through cross-architecture adversarial review.

One hypothesis or mechanism claim. We confirm review scope before work starts.

explore