01 // the challenge

Novel compounds. High stakes. No room for weak evidence.

Novel mechanisms, high stakes

Regulatory scrutiny on psychedelics demands bulletproof evidence. Phase 2/3 trials are expensive. A weak hypothesis wastes years.

Citation integrity under pressure

53% of AI-generated DOIs are fabricated or contested. One bad citation in a grant or paper triggers reviewer rejection.

Hypothesis explosion

Ketamine, psilocybin, MDMA — mechanisms multiply faster than lab capacity. Need adversarial review before committing resources.

02 // the axion approach

Adversarial verification before you commit.

57% rejection rate

Multi-model adversarial pipeline

One model synthesizes. Another attacks. A third checks evidence. 57% of initial hypotheses fail this gauntlet.

53% fabrications caught

Verified citations

Every DOI checked against live databases. No hallucinated references reach your output.

1,538 papers indexed

1,538-paper corpus

Psychedelics-mental-health domain. PubMed-sourced. Indexed for mechanism, compound, and outcome.

03 // results

What the pipeline produces.

1,538 papers analyzed
57% hypothesis rejection
53% DOI fabrications caught
mGlu2/3 hypothesis validated
case example

mGlu2/3 receptor agonism for treatment-resistant depression: Pipeline ingested 1,538 papers. Generated 21 candidate hypotheses. Critic rejected 20 on mechanism plausibility, evidence strength, or safety profile. One hypothesis — mGlu2/3 modulation via psilocybin metabolites — survived with VIABLE verdict. That's the one worth lab time.

04 // start

Research audit for psychedelics work.

Send one hypothesis, draft, or literature question. We run it through the adversarial pipeline and show you what survives.

One hypothesis or draft section. We confirm review scope before work starts.

explore